|
For example, if a woman sacrificed her
career to stay at home to look after the
children leaving her partner free to
progress in his job then she would be at a
disadvantage and should be compensated for
that. Similarly, if a man helped pay for a
mortgage in his partner’s name then that
would give her a clear advantage and that
should be reflected in the financial
agreement.
Courts would be able to order one of the
partners to pay lump sums or sell their
home to provide the other with a fair
settlement. This is an improvement but as
the Commission points out, it is very
different to the situation of married
couples who divorce because it only
relates to contributions made during the
relationship.
With marriage there is an automatic
presumption that both partners are equal
irrespective of their differing
contributions. Unless there are special
circumstances, assets and wealth are
divided equally when a couple divorce.
With co-habiting couples there is no such
presumption no matter how long they live
together.
Co-habiting partners won’t be entitled to
maintenance payments, regardless of their
needs. The only time such support might be
provided is to pay for childcare. This
means some women in particular could still
be left in a vulnerable position.
To qualify for these limited new rights a
couple would have to have children
together or live together for a minimum
period. It’s recommended that this should
be between two and five years.
The proposals are now being considered by
the Ministry of Justice which will decide
whether or not they should be
implemented.
For further information contact Sarah
Perkins , Tel 0115 988 6718, e-mail
Sarah Perkins
Sarah Perkins
is head of The Family Law Department at
Nottingham Firm Andersons Solicitors and
can be contacted by phoning 0115 9470641
or emailing
Sarah Perkins
We produce FREE monthly electronic newsletters including;
Private Individual,
Business and
Employment Law. You can register for
your copy online from our website
or e-mail
Carly Williams. |