  |
 |
 |
In This Issue:
 |
|
• |
Welcome |
 |
|
• |
Ageing workforce |
 |
|
• |
Dismissal investigations |
 |
|
• |
Data protection help |
 |
|
• |
Motivated to strike |
 |
|
• |
New religious hatred law |
 |
|
• |
Getting your act together |
 |
|
• |
And some snippets... |
 |
Featured Links:
|
 |
 |
 |
Welcome
A quick reminder: the minimum annual leave entitlement
for all employees increased to 4.8 weeks (equivalent to
24 days for those working 5 days per week) from 1st
October. In addition, the national minimum wage
increased for adults to £5.52 per hour.
And from the courts, there's a ruling on the
introduction of new evidence on appeal, one on equal
pay, and another on conduct and capability
investigations.
Malcolm Davies
Andersons Solicitors
Ageing workforce
Research by the Department for Work and Pensions on
employer attitudes suggests that more age-friendly HR
policies are emerging, especially around retention and
flexible working.
The survey – published to mark the first anniversary of
the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 taking
effect – also shows that older workers are increasingly
seen as an asset with most employers professing to be
sympathetic to allowing staff to stay on beyond normal
retirement age.
The evidence on recruitment was less encouraging and
while most employers had measures in place to eliminate
formal age discrimination, this did not appear to have
resulted in more older workers being offered work.
Details
here.
Another survey – for Jobcentre Plus – found the main
quality younger workers see older colleagues
contributing is experience while older workers were most
impressed by younger colleagues' ability to learn
quickly. Details
here.
Dismissal investigations
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has
ruled on several points arising from a conduct and
capability investigation involving an employee accused
of malingering. In particular, the employer is under no
obligation to:
- take a statement from whoever
tips off the employer about the alleged malingering if
medical or video evidence is subsequently relied on
when dismissing
- seek a report on malingering from a consultant;
evidence from an occupational health physician is
sufficient.
Data protection help
The Information Commissioner's Office has recently
updated its guidance on what constitutes 'personal data'
under the Data Protection Act. The new guide,
"Determining What is Personal Data", includes
examples showing how data relates to real people.
Updated guidance on what comprises a 'relevant filing
system' will follow soon.
Motivated to strike
What motivates workers to take industrial action depends
on their age, according to research by business
psychologists OPP. Those aged between 35 and 49 would be
most motivated to strike by poor wages and benefits
while those aged 25-34 would walk out over dangerous
working conditions.
Excessive hours were not an issue for 35-49-year-olds
but significantly more of those aged under 35 listed
this as a potential motivator for action.
New religious hatred law
The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 came into force
on 1 October, inserting new sections into the Public
Order Act 1986 and making it an offence to issue threats
or make other intimidating statements likely to stir up
hatred on religious grounds.
All religions now have the same protection – the courts
had previously identified Jews and Sikhs as 'racial
groups' and thus protected under race laws but those of
other faiths, including Muslims and Christians, were
excluded.
Getting your act together
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has emphasized the
importance of getting all the evidence together for
employment tribunal hearings, stating that employers are
generally not allowed a second attempt at defending
claims, even with new evidence.
In the case in question, Hygia Professional Training v
Cutter, an employee had been dismissed for allegedly
trying to poach customers, but at the employment
tribunal hearing the employers produced no real evidence
and claimed they had not realised this was required.
After the tribunal decision, the employers produced four
witness statements offering persuasive evidence that the
ex-employee had, while still employed, been attempting
to solicit work from clients.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held, however, that the
employer had failed to properly explain why such
evidence could not have been produced at the initial
hearing, adding that pleading ignorance or being in
receipt of poor advice would not suffice.
And some snippets...
Equality body takes over
The
Equality and Human Rights Commission took over the
responsibilities of the Commission for Racial Equality,
the Disability Rights Commission, and the Equal
Opportunities Commission on 1 October.
Health and safety advice
The Health and Safety Executive has two new sections on
its website – one
promoting good practice in workplace disability equality
and health and safety risk assessment, and the
second focusing on
falls from vehicles during loading and unloading.
|
 |
 |
|
About Andersons
----------------
Andersons offer a comprehensive employment law service
to a broad client base comprised mainly of quoted and
private companies, public authorities, charities and
private individuals, many of whom are household names.
Our expertise covers all aspects of employment law and
in particular matters relating to litigation,
re-organisations, severance, training and general HR
advice. We act for clients on a nationwide basis and
represent clients all over the country in Employment
Tribunals, the Employment Appeal Tribunals and other
courts.
If you require advice or assistance in respect of any
particular matter, please contact Malcolm Davies on
davies@andersonssolicitors.co.uk . For more
information about Andersons, please see our website
http://www.andersonssolicitors.co.uk .
Disclaimer
----------
The information and any commentary contained in these
bulletins is for general information purposes only and
does not constitute legal or any other type of
professional advice. Andersons Solicitors do not accept
and, to the extent permitted by law, exclude liability
to any person for any loss which may arise from relying
upon or otherwise using the information contained in
these bulletins.
If you have a particular query or issue you are strongly
advised to obtain specific, personal advice about your
case or matter and not to rely on the information or
comments in this bulletin.
|
|
|
|
|
|