  |
 |
 |
In This Issue:
 |
|
• |
Welcome |
 |
|
• |
Smoking ban |
 |
|
• |
Statutory paternity leave |
 |
|
• |
Vulnerable workers |
 |
|
• |
Disability assessments |
 |
|
• |
Equal pay – defining 'same job' |
 |
|
• |
Age discrimination |
 |
|
• |
And some snippets… |
 |
Featured Links:
|
 |
 |
 |
Welcome
One thing all employers must grapple with this month is
making sure that your workplace complies with the new
ban on smoking, which comes into force on 1 July. The
Department of Health, which is responsible for enforcing
the ban, has said it will take a fairly low-profile
approach to enforcement in the early months whilst the
new laws settle in. We suspect many employees will
tip-off the Department of Health if their workplaces are
not completely smoke-free (and anybody tipping off the
Department of Health will, of course, be protected by
the whistleblowing legislation).
Consultation is under way on plans to allow new fathers
to take up their partners' unused maternity leave and
also on proposed changes to trade union law following a
European Court of Human Rights ruling earlier this year.
Malcolm Davies
Andersons Solicitors
Smoking ban
From Sunday, 1 July 2007 it becomes
an offence to smoke in all enclosed workplaces or public
places. The key points of the new law are as follows:
- almost all workplaces will be
smokefree. Public transport and work vehicles used by
more than one person will also need to be smokefree
- A5 size 'no-smoking' signs must be displayed in
all smokefree premises and vehicles (you can
download the sign here)
- Staff smoking rooms and indoor smoking areas will
no longer be allowed, so anyone who wants to smoke
will have to go outside
- Managers of smokefree premises and vehicles will
have legal responsibilities to prevent people from
smoking.
More significantly for employers, it becomes an
offence to permit smoking in the workplace, and to fail
to put up prominent 'non-smoking' signs.
Most breaches will be dealt with by fixed penalties.
Technically, a separate fine can be levied in respect of
every single cigarette lit – although in practice this
is unlikely. The fines are:
- £50 for smoking in a non-smoking area (£30 if paid
within 14 days)
- £200 for failing to display a non-smoking sign
(£150 if paid within 14 days); and,
- £2,500 for failing to prevent smoking in a
smokefree workplace or vehicle. This offence will be
prosecuted in the magistrates' court, rather than
dealt with by a fixed penalty.
For more information, visit
http://www.smokefreeengland.co.uk
Statutory paternity leave
Further consultation is under way on the Department of
Trade and Industry's proposals on implementing 26 weeks'
additional statutory paternity leave.
Under the scheme, a mother who wants to return to work
during the second six months of the baby's life would be
able to pass on some of her statutory maternity leave
and pay to the child's father.
The Government is looking for 'practical comments' on
implementing the scheme to minimise burdens on business
while 'providing more choice for parents'. The
consultation runs until 3 August – more details
here.
Vulnerable workers
Business leaders are working alongside trade union
leaders, academics and minority group representatives on
a new body aimed at investigating vulnerable workers in
the UK.
The Commission on Vulnerable Employment is a TUC
initiative chaired by general secretary Brendan Barber
with a remit which includes investigating the extent of
workplace exploitation and how this can be addressed
through new laws to protect vulnerable staff.
Groups considered particularly vulnerable include agency
workers, migrant workers, homeworkers, informal workers,
atypical temporary workers, younger workers, and unpaid
family workers. More information from the
vulnerable workers website.
Disability assessments
The Court of Appeal is to consider the issue of whether
an employer's failure to make an assessment of a
disabled employee amounts in itself to a failure to make
a 'reasonable adjustment' following several conflicting
decisions from the Employment Appeal Tribunal.
In the latest, Spence v Intype Libra Ltd, the
Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the employer had
not failed to make a reasonable adjustment through its
failure to obtain and consult on a medical report before
dismissing an employee who had become disabled. However,
because of the conflicting decisions, Mr Spence was
given permission to appeal the case further.
Equal pay – defining 'same job'
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has, in Blundell v St
Andrew's Catholic Primary School, handed down the
first decision defining a woman's entitlement to return
after maternity leave 'to the job in which she was
employed before her absence'.
The claimant worked at a school where teachers typically
rotated classes every two years, and when her maternity
leave began she was in charge of a reception class. When
she returned, she was allocated to Year 2 which she
claimed was not a return to the same job.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal however held that it was
and three factors needed to be considered when comparing
'old' and 'new' jobs: nature, capacity, and place. As
the claimant was employed as a primary school teacher,
and she returned to work as such, the employer's
obligation to let her return to the 'same job' was
satisfied.
Age discrimination
Three-quarters of small businesses have not yet put in
place procedures allowing employees to continue working
beyond 65, according to research from the Small
Enterprise Research Team at the Open University.
The survey, for Lloyds TSB, found only 25 per cent of
firms complied with the age discrimination regulations
'right to request' procedures. Almost half – 45 per cent
– said they were still undecided about what to do, and
of these it was because they feared more red tape (40
per cent) or higher costs (21 per cent).
However, of those quizzed, 57 per cent said they would
treat favourably requests to work beyond 65, while only
7 per cent said they would not. More information from
SERT at
http://www.serteam.co.uk/d-commerce/Lloyds_Report.html
And some snippets…
Compensation ruling
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled that employees
cannot receive compensation for periods when it would
have been illegal for them to work. So, in one recent
case, the employee could not receive unfair dismissal
compensation for the period when he would have continued
working for the employer after his work permit ran out.
Race bias persists
Employment causes the most problems for ethnic minority
communities, according to recent research carried out
for the Commission for Racial Equality which found that
over a recent six-month period, 43 per cent of the 5,000
complaints received concerned the workplace. The most
common complaints reported centred on workplace
bullying, lack of career progression, and being unable
to secure job interviews. Details
here.
Fines overhaul
Employers who pay below the minimum wage may face a new
regime of fines under a raft of Department of Trade and
Industry proposals now out for consultation. Businesses
could also have to pay interest or other cash to workers
they have underpaid, on top of repaying arrears, under
the new scheme. Consultation continues until 8 August
2007.
Health and safety merger
The merging of the Health and Safety Commission and
Health and Safety Executive is a step nearer following
publication of the results of the consultation exercise
which ended in March 2007. Key findings show that 80 per
cent of those who took part favoured having a single
unitary health and safety body and agreed with the
overarching principles proposed for it.
|
 |
 |
|
About Andersons
----------------
Andersons offer a comprehensive employment law service
to a broad client base comprised mainly of quoted and
private companies, public authorities, charities and
private individuals, many of whom are household names.
Our expertise covers all aspects of employment law and
in particular matters relating to litigation,
re-organisations, severance, training and general HR
advice. We act for clients on a nationwide basis and
represent clients all over the country in Employment
Tribunals, the Employment Appeal Tribunals and other
courts.
If you require advice or assistance in respect of any
particular matter, please contact Malcolm Davies on
Malcolm Davies . For more information about
Andersons, please see our website
http://www.andersonssolicitors.co.uk .
Disclaimer
----------
The information and any commentary contained in these
bulletins is for general information purposes only and
does not constitute legal or any other type of
professional advice. Andersons Solicitors do not accept
and, to the extent permitted by law, exclude liability
to any person for any loss which may arise from relying
upon or otherwise using the information contained in
these bulletins.
If you have a particular query or issue you are strongly
advised to obtain specific, personal advice about your
case or matter and not to rely on the information or
comments in this bulletin.
|
|
|
|
|
|